This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
derivative_market_within_stellar.org_net_project [2017/04/24 08:05] sacarlson [Technicals of What’s needed to add a derivative market traded on stellar.org network] |
derivative_market_within_stellar.org_net_project [2017/04/24 08:22] (current) sacarlson [Can we have more than one account deposit funds as sellers of a contract?] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Technicals of What’s needed to add a derivative market traded on stellar.org network ===== | + | ====== Technicals of What’s needed to add a derivative market traded on stellar.org network ====== |
- | Funtracker.site Bank has begun preliminary design of a derivative market run from within stellar.org network integrated trade system. | + | Funtracker.site Bank has begun preliminary design of a derivative market run from within stellar.org networks integrated trade system. |
It’s time our dreams become your reality. | It’s time our dreams become your reality. | ||
- | I have been asked now by a few people and from some of our friends in NYC that have been asking me about the possibilities of setting up a derivative market on the stellar.net internal trading market. I think this could be huge with the present market of derivatives now at an estimated 1.2 Quadrillion USD in capitalized market value. If we just get involved in 0.001% of that market it would still be huuuge. So with my contacts interest and the known world capitalization in this market it seems like a no brainer. | + | ===== Why do we need this? ===== |
+ | I have been asked now by a few people and from some of our friends in NYC that have been asking me about the possibilities of setting up a derivative market on the stellar.net internal trading market. I think this could be huge with the present market of derivatives now at an estimated 1.2 Quadrillion USD in capitalized market value. If we just get involved in 0.001% of that market it would still be huuuge. So with my contacts interest and the known world capitalization in this market it seems like a no brainer. | ||
===== What are derivatives? ===== | ===== What are derivatives? ===== | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
===== Can't we have a single bonded deposit for each account with multi contracts running? ===== | ===== Can't we have a single bonded deposit for each account with multi contracts running? ===== | ||
- | I'm not sure about this one as it would be much more complex to even know how close a group of contracts were from becoming insolvent. If this could be done it might require less escrowed funds to create a group of contracts that might be working against each other like pairs of put call on an asset. Maybe just limit multi to put call on the same asset at some point and later expand on methods to track entire portfolio of an account to verify liquidity. | + | I'm not sure about this one as it would be much more complex to even know how close a group of contracts were from becoming insolvent. If this could be done it might require less escrowed funds to create a group of contracts that might be working against each other like pairs of put call on an asset. Maybe just limit multi to put call on the same asset at some point and later expand on methods to track entire portfolios or at least all linked to a single asset on an account to verify liquidity. |
+ | ===== Can we have more than one account deposit funds as sellers of a contract? ===== | ||
+ | I guess so but they will all go insolvent at the same time I would assume or am I wrong. maybe the added funds from more than one issue seller would add liquidity? I think I would have to run some spread sheet simulations on this to verify at some point. | ||
===== Who and how would the bots get paid for there services? ===== | ===== Who and how would the bots get paid for there services? ===== | ||
I'm guessing someone will have to pay for the team of trust bots to perform there services of monitoring and signing of contracts. The final contract distribution would have some amount of the funds diverted to each of the team of bots involved in the contract. This might be in some small percentage of the net of the contract block or a fixed fee for each contract. There is also no reason there can't be more than one team of bots that can compete on prices charged for services rendered. The choice may also depend on what group of bots are most trusted on the net at the time. Their reliability records and such also would be a part or what the market would be willing to pay the trust bot group. | I'm guessing someone will have to pay for the team of trust bots to perform there services of monitoring and signing of contracts. The final contract distribution would have some amount of the funds diverted to each of the team of bots involved in the contract. This might be in some small percentage of the net of the contract block or a fixed fee for each contract. There is also no reason there can't be more than one team of bots that can compete on prices charged for services rendered. The choice may also depend on what group of bots are most trusted on the net at the time. Their reliability records and such also would be a part or what the market would be willing to pay the trust bot group. |